Where are the remnants of a Jurassic ocean in the eastern Mediterranean region?
Authors:
Eyuboglu et al
Abstract:
The subduction polarity of Tethyan oceanic lithosphere during Jurassic is a controversial topic in relation to the geodynamic evolution of the Alpine–Himalayan system. We present new geological, geochemical and zircon U–Pb data from four different regions of the Eastern Pontides Orogenic Belt, a key area of the Alpine–Himalayan system. We discuss the origin of the magmatism and also the existence of an ocean in the eastern Mediterranean region during the Jurassic period. Jurassic intrusions, predominantly gabbro, tonalite and minor diorite, are well exposed in the southern and axial zones of the orogenic belt. Thermobarometry indicates that high-pressure (6–10 kb) crystallization of these intrusions occurred at temperatures of 1183–1250 °C. Zircon U–Pb dating from 10 samples show ages between 195 and 165 Ma, indicating that magmatism occurred between Sinemurian and Callovian time. We characterize the intrusions from electron microprobe, zircon geochronology, and whole rock and Sr, Nd, and Pb isotopes. Our data show that the studied intrusions are broadly tholeiitic, except for two calc-alkaline bodies, and formed in an arc-related setting with minimal involvement of older crust or sediment.
The most widely accepted model proposes that the ultramafic–mafic rocks exposed between the Pontide arc and the Tauride belt are remnants of a Jurassic Penrose-type and/or suprasubduction zone ophiolite. However, new zircon U–Pb age data from mafic lithologies cutting the Kop ultramafic massif do not support this model and clearly indicate that the ultramafic lithologies are Paleozoic or older in age and are not remnants of a Jurassic ocean that known as ‘’Northern Branch of Neotehtys”.
Showing posts with label neotethys. Show all posts
Showing posts with label neotethys. Show all posts
Sunday, November 01, 2015
There was no "‘Northern Branch of Neotethys” During the Jurassic
Labels:
Callovian,
Jurassic,
mesozoic,
neotethys,
paleoenvironment,
paleogeography,
paleooceans,
sinemurian
Thursday, May 30, 2013
More Evidence of a Toarcian Mass Extinction: Ammonites Had Low Diversity in Toarcian Jurassic Northern NeoTethys of Cacasian Russia
Spatial heterogeneity of the Early–Middle Toarcian (Jurassic) ammonite diversity and basin geometry in the Northwestern Caucasus (southwestern Russia; northern Neo-Tethys)
Author:
1. Dmitry A. Ruban (a)
Affiliation:
a. Division of Mineralogy and Petrography, Geology and Geography Faculty, Southern Federal University, Zorge Street 40, Rostov-na-Donu, 344090, Russian Federation
Abstract:
Palaeontological and geological information from the Northwestern Caucasus, a large region in southwestern Russia, allows to evaluate the spatial heterogeneity of the Early–Middle Toarcian ammonite diversity and its possible controls. The total number of ammonite species and genera is calculated for four time slices, which correspond to the D. semicelatum, H. falciferum, H. bifrons, and H. variabilis zones, in each of ten areas distinguished within the study region. These areas differ by the ammonite diversity, which indicates heterogeneity. The latter persisted through the entire Early–Middle Toarcian. This heterogeneity was relatively low in the beginning of the Toarcian, when the total regional diversity of ammonites was minimal. Long- and short-term landward shoreline shifts facilitated spatial distribution of ammonites and increase in their taxa number. Shallow-marine palaeoenvironments tended to sustain a higher diversity than those deep-marine, and, therefore, changes in the basin depth were also responsible for the observed spatial heterogeneity of the ammonite diversity. Interestingly, a more or less similar diversity dynamics is established in the areas of the Northwestern Caucasus. The distribution of ammonites in the study region indicates that these invertebrates migrated to there from the open sea(s) stretched along the northern margin of the Neo-Tethys Ocean. Results of the present analysis also imply that the mass extinction might have been responsible for the low diversity of ammonites (observed in the entire region and its particular areas) in the beginning of the Toarcian.
Labels:
Ammonoids,
fossils,
Jurassic,
marine ecosystems,
mass extinction,
mesozoic,
neotethys,
paleoenvironment,
paleontology,
paleooceans,
Russia,
tethys,
toarcian
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
