Wednesday, March 04, 2009

Basal Theropods Had Bird Hands



Two handprints pressed into the mud of an ancient lakeshore 198 million years ago has given paleontologists new insights into the anatomy and evolution of early carnivorous dinosaurs. The theropod who crouched down had a bird-like forelimb structure with palms that always faced inwards, says lead researcher Andrew Milner, which indicates that they stopped using their forelimbs for walking early in their evolutionary history.

The handprints discovered in Utah are part of a larger track that clearly show the hind feet and, occasionally, the dragging tail. But at one point, Milner said, the theropod apparently stopped and crouched to rest. At that point, between the footprints, is the clear circular impression of the ischium or pelvis, “basically a butt print,” Milner said. And to each side of the tracks are the handprints, which are mirror images of each other. They clearly show the third digit pressed into the ground and traces of the second digit, with the claw curling inward. The hands were positioned as they would be for “holding on to a basketball rather than dribbling it,” [Los Angeles Times], comments paleontologist Tom Holtz, who wasn’t involved in the research.

The new study, published in the journal PLoS ONE, indicates that the unidentified species of theropod couldn’t turn the palms of its hands face down or face up like a human, but could bend them back against the arm similar to how a bird folds its wings. Jerry Harris, who coauthored the paper, said being able to fold the hands against the arms evolved before feathery wings — and at a time earlier than the period normally associated with theropods.


Sarah at Gombessa Girl has two posts on the subject. She knows the people involved and helped out to some extent it seems. Some interesting evolutionary implications here. I wonder how the "birds are not dinosaurs!!!" crowd are going to react? heh.

5 comments:

  1. Anonymous7:22 AM

    "Theopod"?

    ...actually, that sounds pretty awesome. I have trouble imagining what a theopod would look like, but I bet I wouldn't want to get in its way.


    Doug M.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Theopod" DOH! The problems of multitasking. OTOH, Theopod sounds like an interesting basis for a book.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Birds aren't dinosaurs"??????

    Who the heck believes that nowadays???? I am confused....

    ReplyDelete
  4. Are the "birds" in the picture background pterosaurs (200ma?)?

    Great read, I like the interpretation.

    ReplyDelete
  5. There's a merry lil band of denialists, Raven. One of them is fairly well known. ah. Feduccia.

    Dude: I 'think' that the birds are supposed to be pterosaurs, yes.

    ReplyDelete