Wednesday, March 06, 2013

Dynamics of the Snowball Earth's Ocean


Dynamics of a Snowball Earth ocean

Authors:

1. Yosef Ashkenazy (a)
2. Hezi Gildor (b)
3. Martin Losch (c)
4. Francis A. Macdonald (d)
5. Daniel P. Schrag (d,e)
6. Eli Tziperman (d,e)

Affiliations:


a. Department of Solar Energy and Environmental Physics, The Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben-Gurion, 84990, Israel

b. Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel

c. Alfred-Wegener-Institut für Polar- und Meeresforschung, 27515 Bremerhaven, Germany

d. Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, 20 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA

e. School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, 20 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA

Abstract:

Geological evidence suggests that marine ice extended to the Equator at least twice during the Neoproterozoic era (about 750 to 635 million years ago) inspiring the Snowball Earth hypothesis that the Earth was globally ice-covered. In a possible Snowball Earth climate, ocean circulation and mixing processes would have set the melting and freezing rates that determine ice thickness would have influenced the survival of photosynthetic life and may provide important constraints for the interpretation of geochemical and sedimentological observations. Here we show that in a Snowball Earth, the ocean would have been well mixed and characterized by a dynamic circulation, with vigorous equatorial meridional overturning circulation, zonal equatorial jets, a well developed eddy field, strong coastal upwelling and convective mixing. This is in contrast to the sluggish ocean often expected in a Snowball Earth scenario owing to the insulation of the ocean from atmospheric forcing by the thick ice cover. As a result of vigorous convective mixing, the ocean temperature, salinity and density were either uniform in the vertical direction or weakly stratified in a few locations. Our results are based on a model that couples ice flow and ocean circulation, and is driven by a weak geothermal heat flux under a global ice cover about a kilometre thick. Compared with the modern ocean, the Snowball Earth ocean had far larger vertical mixing rates, and comparable horizontal mixing by ocean eddies. The strong circulation and coastal upwelling resulted in melting rates near continents as much as ten times larger than previously estimated. Although we cannot resolve the debate over the existence of global ice cover, we discuss the implications for the nutrient supply of photosynthetic activity and for banded iron formations. Our insights and constraints on ocean dynamics may help resolve the Snowball Earth controversy when combined with future geochemical and geological observations.

1 comment:

  1. I propose that the “snowball Earth” was brought to a close by the dust from a huge meteorite (the largest known on Earth) impacting Australia settling onto the ice and melting it by a bare soil warming affect (see http://charles_w.tripod.com/climate.html ) and thus initiating the Cambrian. The dust fertilizing the ocean probably contributed considerably to the explosion of life then. That initiation was probably considerably assisted by the subsequent release of methane gas from methane ice under the ocean floor and by dust from volcanic eruptions from the Bahamas Islands, which are located at the antipode (opposite side of a sphere) of the above impact. (see http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Research%20Papers-Geology/Download/4671 for a discussion of that antipode phenomena. Also see http://www.austhrutime.com/mapcis.htm for a discussion of Connelly’s discovery of the crater.) The close correlation of volcanoes on Mars with meteorite impacts at their antipodes gives supporting evidence for such a phenomenon.
    (see http://charles_w.tripod.com/dweber/mars_volcanos/mars_volcanos2.html ) for Mars. For a discussion of Earth phenomena see http://charles_w.tripod.com/antipode.html .
    .
    Sincerely, Charles Weber

    ReplyDelete