Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Blog Info
News Groups
SHWIer Blogroll
NMican Blogs
The World According to Blondage
Paleo Blogs
The Hairy Museum of Natural History
Bio Blogs
Others of Note
Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia
Archived Blogs
Web Comics
Mass Extinction Posts
Paleo Ecology Posts
Therapsid Posts
Other Paleo Science
Previous Posts
- Patchy Week
- NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...
- Sasselov: Hundreds of Earth Like Planets?
- A Prank From Years Ago
- Antillothrix bernensis Fossil Found via Scuba Divi...
- WISE Completes a Sky Map
- Most Hits EV-AH
- Boeing Building "Commercial" Space Capsule
- China Uses More Energy Than the US?
- Laser Used in a Naval Enviroment to Down UAV


3 Comments:
If they're going to all that trouble, I wish they'd redefine the Phanerozoic to include the Ediacaran. It's a glaring anomaly otherwise.
The problem is that this USGS timescale is actually more out-of-date than the one released by GSA last year:
Walker, J. D., and J. W. Geissman. 2009. GSA geologic time scale. GSA Today 19:60-61.
As Chris notes, the new USGS timescale omits the Ediacaran and fails to revise the ages for the Late Triassic stages.
Its all too bad, because I've seen a variety of blogs talking about this being the 'newest' timescale.
My bad - I see the Ediacaran is actually there. Chris - it is in the Proterozoic, where it should be.
Post a Comment
<< Home