Showing posts with label azharchids. Show all posts
Showing posts with label azharchids. Show all posts

Friday, November 28, 2014

Alanqa saharica: an Albanian/Campanian Cretaceous Azhdarchid Pterosaur With an Unusual Jaw Modification


An unusual modification of the jaws in cf. Alanqa, a mid-Cretaceous azhdarchid pterosaur from the Kem Kem beds of Morocco

Authors:

Martill et al

Abstract:

A jaw bone attributed to the mid-Cretaceous azhdarchid pterosaur Alanqa saharica Ibrahim et al., 2010 is described. The new specimen from the Kem Kem beds of south eastern Morocco is unusual for the presence of expanded rostral bones that protrude above the occlusal surface of the jaws. The function of this unusual osteological modification is uncertain, but it is considered likely that it served a role in food processing, or perhaps jaw stability.

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Medullary Bone-like Tissue in Found in Satonian Cretaceous Pterosaur Bakonydraco


Medullary bone-like tissue in the mandibular symphyses of a pterosaur suggests non-reproductive significance

Authors:

Prondvai et al

Abstract:

Medullary bone is a special bone tissue forming on the endosteal surface of the medullary cavity in the bones of female birds prior to and during egg-laying to serve as a calcium reservoir for building the hard eggshell. It has also been identified in non-avian dinosaurs, where its presence is considered as a reliable indicator of a sexually mature female. Here, we reveal that multiple mandibular symphyses of the azhdarchid pterosaur Bakonydraco galaczi possess a special bone tissue that shows all microanatomical, histological, and developmental characteristics of medullary bone, despite its unusual location. Its frequent occurrence in the sample renders a pathologic origin unlikely. Our findings as well as the extremely thin-shelled eggs of pterosaurs suggest that this medullary bone-like tissue probably had a non-reproductive role in these animals. Although the non-reproductive significance and the anatomical location of this medullary bone-like tissue in Bakonydraco suggest independent evolutionary appearance from dinosaurian medullary bone, a common origin and later diverging function and physiological regulation is an equally viable phylogenetic hypothesis.

Wednesday, July 02, 2014

Azhdarchid Pterosaur Fossil Found in Campanian Cretaceous Russia

A pterosaurian vertebra from the Upper Cretaceous of the Saratov Region

Authors:

Averianov et al

Abstract:

A dorsal vertebra referred to as Azhdarchidae indet. from the Rybushka Formation (Upper Cretaceous, Lower Campanian) of the Beloe Ozero locality in the Saratov Region is described. Its vertebral centrum has a hypapophysis and, at the base of the neural arch, there is a large pneumatic foramen. The vertebra possibly belongs to Volgadraco bogolubovi Averianov, Arkhangelskii et Pervushov, 2008, described from the Rybushka Formation of the Shirokii Karamysh 2 locality in the Saratov Region.

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Paleoecology of Azhdarchid Pterosaurs: Giant Pelicans or Theropod Competitors

Apex predators from ecosystems containing giant azhdarchids to scale with a giant azhdarchid
species, A, the largest known tyrannosaurid, Tyrannosaurus rex from North America, contemporary
of Quetzalcoatlus northropi and other large azhdarchids; B, the small Haţeg dromaeosaur Balaur
bondoc, contemporary of Hatzegopteryx thambema;. C, the 10 m wingspan Arambourgiania
philadelphiae (note that H. thambema was proportionally more robust than Arambourgiania); D,
Homo sapiens, standing height of 1.83 m. {two column width}
Azhdarchid pterosaurs: water-trawling pelican mimics or "terrestrial stalkers"?

Authors:

Mark P. Witton and Darren Naish

Abstract:

The lifestyles of all pterosaurs are contentious, but those of the pterodactyloid clade Azhdarchidae are particularly debated. A 2008 review of the functional morphology of azhdarchid pterosaurs concluded that they were probably terrestrial foragers, as evidenced by their long limbs, generalised skull construction, the arthrological limitations of their cervical series, trackway data indicating terrestrial proficiency, a strong continental skew in the depositional context of their fossils, and several additional lines of corroborating evidence. This hypothesis was recently challenged on three counts: 1) azhdarchid fossils routinely occur in aquatic deposits; 2) terrestrially-foraging pterosaurs were highly vulnerable to predation and 3), aerial ‘water trawling’, where the mandible is pulled though water to catch food in a distended throat pouch, is a more likely foraging strategy. Pelican-like jaw mechanics were suggested for azhdarchids because of the asymmetrical jaw joints in these pterosaurs, which permit lateral deflection of the mandibular rami during jaw extension. We evaluate these three claims and conclude that all are flawed. The frequent occurrence of azhdarchid fossils in aquatic sedimentary systems is not significant with regard to ecology or behaviour, since these provide the overwhelming mechanism for the preservation of all fossil terrestrial animals. Likely pterosaur takeoff abilities and the ubiquitous nature of modern, terrestrially-foraging birds indicate that predation risks on ground-foraging pterosaurs are probably overstated. The kinematics of pterosaur jaws are entirely different to those of pelicans, which are highly specialised compared to those of all other tetrapods, and there are no indications from azhdarchid jaw anatomy that azhdarchids indulged in pelican-like foraging behaviour. The estimated amount of jaw expansion present in azhdarchids was minimal compared to that of pelicans, even when the asymmetrical jaw joints of azhdarchids are taken into account. Moreover, the widespread occurrence of asymmetrical jaw joints in other reptiles demonstrates that they are not related to any specific feeding habits. We conclude that terrestrial foraging remains the most parsimonious habit for azhdarchid pterosaurs.

Mark also has an awesome post up on his own blog on the paper.