Showing posts with label kungurian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label kungurian. Show all posts

Friday, March 07, 2014

Was Kungurian Permian captorhinid Eureptile Captorhinikos valensis a Herbivore?



The captorhinid reptile Captorhinikos valensis from the lower Permian Vale Formation of Texas, and the evolution of herbivory in eureptiles

Authors:

Modesto et al

Abstract:

Captorhinikos valensis is a poorly known, multiple-tooth-rowed captorhinid reptile from the Lower Permian Vale Formation of Texas. Our reappraisal of C. valensis reveals it to be a small moradisaurine, exhibiting a maximum of five rows of bullet-shaped teeth in the multiple-rowed region of both the maxilla and the dentary. The slightly radiating organization of the tooth rows distinguishes C. valensis from the parallel arrangement of the tooth rows exhibited by all other moradisaurines. Captorhinikos valensis is also distinguishable from the coeval moradisaurine Labidosaurikos meachami by a more conspicuously denticulated, broader, ‘U’-shaped transverse flange of the pterygoid, a plesiomorphic morphology shared with the large, single-rowed captorhinid Labidosaurus hamatus. Postcranial information is limited to two short series of presacral vertebrae not associated with the cranial materials; open neurocentral sutures are present in one specimen, indicating immaturity at death. We investigated the relationships of C. valensis to other captorhinids by adding it to the data matrix of a previously published analysis that included several moradisaurine captorhinids. A branch-and-bound PAUP analysis discovered a single optimal tree. Whereas a previous analysis of captorhinid interrelationships found the (undifferentiated) genus Captorhinikos to fall outside of a clade composed of L. hamatus and the large moradisaurines, our analysis recovered C. valensis in a clade with the genera Labidosaurikos, Gansurhinus, Moradisaurus, and Rothianiscus (i.e., Moradisaurinae sensu stricto), and Captorhinikos chozaensis as the sister species of a clade that includes L. hamatus and Moradisaurinae s.s.; Captorhinikos chozaensis is no longer classifiable as a moradisaurine (according to our phylogenetic definition for the group), and should be assigned to a new genus. Stratigraphic calibration of our captorhinid phylogeny indicates that moradisaurines evolved by the middle Kungurian (middle Leonardian).

Monday, April 18, 2011

Permian Reptile With a Tooth Ache


A reptile that lived 275-million years ago in what is now Oklahoma is giving paleontologists a glimpse of the oldest known toothache.

Led by Professor Robert Reisz, the chair of the Department of Biology at the University of Toronto Mississauga, scientists found evidence of bone damage due to oral infection in Paleozoic reptiles as they adapted to living on land. Their findings, published online in the journal Naturwissenschaften – The Nature of Science, predate the previous record for oral and dental disease in a terrestrial vertebrate by nearly 200 million years.

"Not only does this fossil extend our understanding of dental disease, it reveals the advantages and disadvantages that certain creatures faced as their teeth evolved to feed on both meat and plants," says Reisz. "In this case, as with humans, it may have increased their susceptibility to oral infections."

The researchers investigated the jaws of several well-preserved specimens of Labidosaurus hamatus, a 275-million-year-old terrestrial reptile from North America. One specimen stood out because of missing teeth and associated erosion of the jaw bone. With the aid of CT-scanning, Reisz and colleagues found evidence of a massive infection. This resulted in the loss of several teeth, as well as bone destruction in the jaw in the form of an abscess and internal loss of bone tissue.

As the ancestors of advanced reptiles adapted to life on land, many evolved dental and cranial specializations to feed more efficiently on other animals and to incorporate high-fiber plant leaves and stems into their diet. The primitive dental pattern in which teeth were loosely attached to the jaws and continuously replaced, changed in some animals. Teeth became strongly attached to the jaw, with little or no tooth replacement. This was clearly advantageous to some early reptiles, allowing them to chew their food and thus improve nutrient absorption. The abundance and global distribution of Labidosauris and its kin suggest that it was an evolutionary success.

However, Reisz and his colleagues suggest that as this reptile lost the ability to replace teeth, the likelihood of infections of the jaw, resulting from damage to the teeth, increased substantially. This is because prolonged exposure of the dental pulp cavity of heavily worn or damaged teeth to oral bacteria was much greater than in other animals that quickly replaced their teeth.

Is Captorhinidae parareptilia or diapsid these days?