In a paper published in the journal Science today, scientists Gabriel A. Vecchi of NOAA's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Kyle L. Swanson of the University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Atmospheric Sciences Group and Brian J. Soden from the University of Miami's Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science teamed up to study hurricane data observed over more than 50 years. The study explores the relationship between sea surface temperature (SST) and seasonal hurricane activity, and show how differing interpretations of the observational record can imply vastly different futures for Atlantic hurricane activity due to global warming. The two interpretations arise from assumptions of whether it is the local SST in the Atlantic in isolation, or whether it is the SST in the Atlantic 'relative' to the rest of the tropics, that drives variations in Atlantic hurricane activity.
If one assumes the former (the local SST hypothesis), then by 2100, the lower bound on Atlantic hurricane activity is comparable to that of 2005, when four major hurricanes struck the continental United States, causing more than $100 billion in damage. The upper bound exceeds 2005 levels by more than a factor of two. However, if one assumes the latter (the relative SST hypothesis), then the future is similar to the recent past, with periods of higher and lower hurricane activity relative to present-day conditions due to natural climate variability, but with little long-term trend.
If the upper bound is 8 hurricanes per 'average' year for the more catastrophic model, does that cross the threshold of making building (and rebuilding) there uneconomical. 21st century population shifts are going to be interesting. Safe Bet: Alaska gets a 10x increase in people.
3 comments:
"Safe Bet: Alaska gets a 10x increase in people."
Crap.
Either way, my step mom has thrown down the gauntlet. Her demand is to be living north of I-12 before the start of the next hurricane season. She's a life long resident of the area too.
No worries Scotte, I *highly* doubt they'll be going to Alaska. I'm more worried that they're coming to Vegas! ;)
No worries Scotte, I *highly* doubt they'll be going to Alaska.
Oh, IDK. A 15c increase (mirroring Greenland) might make it quite a nice place. well, other than the summer. :D
I'm more worried that they're coming to Vegas!
LOL.
No. Not at all. There's a major water issue coming to Vegas. WAAAAY above and beyond what has happened in the past. Y'know the snow cap that supplies you via the Colorado?
baibai!
The wetsern interior is going to end up MORE continental climate wise, but with a lot less snow.
Post a Comment